Not all jobseekers qualify as serious

Chances are you have never met a jobseeker who told you he wasn’t serious. No one thinks of himself as not being serious when it comes to serious job hunting. As a group, jobseekers do not identify them­selves as commodities, products or merchandise, but as unique individuals.
Randomly prepare 500 or more résumés and it is hard to resist the temptation not to categorize. By the time you work for 800 jobseekers, you have encountered everything from technically challenged luddites to overachievers. As new jobseekers enter the market, repetitive patterns emerge.
From an employer’s perspective, jobseekers tend to get classified quickly into distinct scenarios: There are those who tell employers what they want to hear. (These are often get classified as C-players.) There is nothing wrong with being a C-player, but do not be disappoint to learn you’ll have stiff competition.
Another group of jobseekers rely solely on what they know and precede accord­ingly. (These qualify as B-players.) In large measure, B-players tend to be highly skilled or technically oriented. The rely heavily on their knowledge base to carry the day.
In the smallest group are those who dynamically demonstrate their potential. (This group of jobseekers gets categorized as A-players.) Naturally, they have their act together, they interview exceedingly well, and they are much sought after. Oddly, these candidates face little or no competition in the job market.
For various reasons—and there are many—everyone else gets lumped into the non-serious category. This should not imply that those jobseekers themselves aren’t serious, it’s just that from the employer's perspective, they don’t get classified as such.
When dealing with volumes of jobseekers, behavioral patterns begin to jump out at you. Whatever might escape one’s attention on a small scale quickly emerges as the volume of candidates escalates. Thus, there exists an overwhelm desire to expeditiously rate and classify candidates.
The glaring difference between being interviewed by someone preparing your résumé and a hiring decision maker amounts to their mission. The résumé writer attempts to qualify the client jobseeker, while employers make an all-out effort to disqualifying candidates through elimination.
Most jobseekers – an estimated 60% -- make the elimination process horrendously easy. Such jobseekers will apply for positions for which they are clearly unqualified or unsuited. Others resort to copying résumé material from books and others. These individuals get quickly classified as non-serious jobseekers.
As I have often indicated, each résumé sends a message, whether intentional or other­wise. For example, a jobseeker who submits a lengthy résumé may be perceived as someone who is inconsiderate or perhaps full of himself. Those who submit hard-to-read material are often perceived as disconnected, lacking withitness or perhaps careless.
Certainly, those who fail to qualify due to lack of relevant experience, skillsets and/or education are viewed by employers as time-wasters. One of the surest ways to be eliminated is attempting to market out­dated experience. Those individuals get instantly classified as past-their-prime jobseekers.
Employers who receive a short stack of résumés—let’s say around 20—it’s like shuffling a deck of cards looking for face-cards and aces. The stack can be visually scanned to eliminate the low-value cards in a few minutes.
Obviously, when employers need to shuffle many decks of cards (résumés), then using a card shuffler makes sense. In this case, the card shuffler amounts to using an Applicant Tracking System (ATS), which can scan, sort and evaluate a pile of material in nanoseconds. Those attempting to outwit ATS apps will encounter an ever-dwindling audience. In short, the AI software is becoming highly sophisticated.
The ultimate question is: How does a job candidate avoid projecting the image of someone who is not serious? The quick response is to avoid the classic mistakes. That, however, amounts to avoiding an exhaustive list of not-so-subtle no-nos.

Should you find a résumé writer good at what he or she does, pay the freight. Nine out of ten times, the writer will save you from self-inflicted folly. At minimum, you will avoid coming across as a jobseeker who isn’t serious.