Not everyone makes sound decisions. (No surprise there.) One might suppose it would be in one’s best
self-interest to get it right—especially if the decision involves something
important like job interviewing. What may surprise many is that most of our decisions
amount to spontaneous choices without consideration given to long-term
consequences.
In short, we usually
choose ‘feels good’ options, rather than what might benefit us in the vague and
distant future. Behaviorists refer to this as instant gratification versus delayed
gratification.
The problem
with instant gratification decisions is that they usually trump logic,
reasoning, and common sense. Only when something goes materially wrong or
disaster befalls the individual do we instantly acquire 20/20 hindsight. To
illustrate this concept, we will use job interviewing.
We start by
posing a question: Is it a good idea to
practice for job interviews? The overwhelming majority (95-98%) agree that
it is. With such an overwhelming percentage in lopsided agreement, does that
imply that most jobseekers will in fact practice for interviews? – Absolutely not!
Statistically,
80% of jobseekers perform badly in interviews. It turns out that less than 20% actually
practice for them. Within that 20%, less than half of those that do practice
actually exert a bona fide effort. (Now
we’re talking single-digits.) The slightly larger portion will focus only on
those questions that might pose an interviewing challenge to respond honestly.
(Shocking as that appears, many will focus on rehearsing something that
sounds good or plausible.)
New question: What could possibly account for saying one thing, and then proceeding to
do quite the opposite?
The rationales
generally follow this line of reasoning: “I am pretty sure I can wing (or b.s.) it. Therefore, investing the
extra effort would be a waste of time.” The short-term gratification: Extra
time to do something else and the time required to seriously practice has been conveniently
avoided. Voilà.
Here is another
popular rationale jobseekers tell themselves: “Practicing for job interviews is
an excellent idea, but the position may not be the right opportunity for me.
Therefore I need to wait for the right opportunity before exerting the extra
effort.” The short-term gratification: No effort required, self-imposed
expectations lowered, and the notion of potential failure temporarily avoided.
Both examples
represent beautiful rationalizations but nonetheless flawed. Honing the skillset
and rehearsing for job interviews is an enormous, time-consuming challenge that
can easily consume several weeks. If it were as easy as popping a pill to get
rid of a headache, a whole lot more jobseekers would opt to do it.
Confronting
reality can be a scary proposition, which accounts for why many avoid it. When
an individual does not like the available options—including the obvious or
long-term solution—the individual tends to ignore or deny the problem. Thus, by
denying the problem, it leaves nothing to fix, and thereby eliminating the
painful inconvenience.
Copyrighted © 2015 by
Robert James with Confidential Résumé Writing